Obama to Regulate Kitchen Appliances
In the past, the big-government progressives used to promise a chicken in every pot and a car in every driveway. Today’s progressives only rip those dreams away thanks to the unrelenting march of “green” regulation. First, the government went after automakers and the coal industry. Now, the Obama administration is going after the appliances that cook the chicken. “The Obama administration is working on new efficiency standards for seemingly every appliance but the kitchen sink,” The Hill reports. “The administration says the standards will not only help the planet but also stimulate the economy by saving consumers money on their energy bills that they can spend elsewhere.” In reality, increased regulation means appliances will get more expensive and more out of reach for the average consumer. But the Obama administration knows better than us simple commoners or the manufacturers of air conditioners, blenders and dishwashers. So prices rise as he leads us who knows where. More…
My Opinion: Obama seems to think that there is nothing more important than to screw with Americans in any way possible. Aren’t there more important things to worry about than what kind of appliances we have in our kitchens? Shouldn’t that be left with us and the free market? How long before the Government mandates that all your appliances be hooked into the Internet? (You know why!)
$3 Million Went to Study Lesbian Obesity
The National Institute of Health has sunk almost $3 million into studies trying to figure out why 75% of lesbians are overweight and male homosexuals remain slender. Last year, the researchers “concluded that gay and bisexual males had a ‘greater desire for toned muscles’ than straight men,” the Washington Free Beacon reported. “The project now claims that lesbians have lower ‘athletic-self esteem’ that may lead to higher rates of obesity. Another research paper found that lesbians are more likely to see themselves at a healthy weight, even though they are not.” Self-identified homosexuals make up only 1.6% of the U.S. population, which shows how much of an overweight priority homosexuals are in popular culture. They are of particular concern to the Left because the homosexual community is a major source of donations for progressive campaigns. Hence wasting taxpayer dollars on waistlines. More…
My Opinion: Because, you know, why lesbians are FAT is of prime importance to the rest of us. You know, more important than where we’re going to get a job and make some money to feed our families. More important than our surviving day-to-day since we can’t make any long range plans under this Administration. And WAY more important than the possible Terrorists that are crossing our Southern border with malice and forethought to cause us serious bodily harm.
Who gives a flying fook why Lesbians are FAT and Homo’s are skinny. If they want to know then let them pay for the study. I shouldn’t have to pay for it.
Columnist Thomas Sowell: “With many people now acting as if it is time for ‘a woman’ to become president, apparently they have learned absolutely nothing from the disastrous results of the irresponsible self-indulgence of choosing a President of the United States on the basis of demographic characteristics, instead of individual qualifications. It would not matter to me if the next five presidents in a row were all women, if these happened to be the best individuals available at the time. But to say that we should now elect ‘a woman’ president in 2016 is to say that we are willfully blind to the dangers of putting life and death decisions in the hands of someone chosen for symbolic reasons. … No public official should be considered to be above criticism – and the higher up that official is, the more important it is to hold his or her feet to the fire when it comes to carrying out duties involving the life and death of individuals and the fate of the nation.”
My Opinion: The same people that voted for Obama because he was Black (or mostly Black anyway) will be the same fools, er, folks that will vote ANY woman in as President. They don’t learn. They don’t care to learn. They are incapable of learning from experience or proof. If we had let Darwinism rule (as it did for most of eternity) the rest of us wouldn’t have to worry about them. But, we instituted “warning labels” and let the Libtards bully us into protecting these dipshidiots from themselves. Obama is what we got as repayment from them. Clinton would be twelve times worse. In truth, ANY Woman voted into office because she is a “woman” would be worse. At least pick one that is qualified!
Patriot Post – Digest For Tuesday